Un personaj poate fi numit antipatic numai dac\u0103 a\u0219a l-a vrut autorul, altfel discu\u021bia nu duce nic\u0103ieri, fiecare cititor antipatizeaz\u0103 altceva, pe altcineva \u0219i motivele s\u00eent la fel de variate. Antipatizezi pe cineva doar c\u0103-\u021bi aminte\u0219te de altcineva din copil\u0103rie care \u021bi-a f\u0103cut un r\u0103u de un fel sau altul sau pentru c\u0103 \u021bi se pare fals sau prea str\u0103in de ceea ce e\u0219ti sau poate \u021bi-e prea asem\u0103n\u0103tor (doi anxio\u0219i se antipatizeaz\u0103, la fel dou\u0103 dive) sau \u021bi-e antipatic dar te fascineaz\u0103, cum \u00eemi zice mama c\u00eend se uit\u0103 la televizor \u201ece antipatic\u0103 mi-e actri\u021ba asta, n-o suport\u201d dar continu\u0103 s\u0103 se uite. E\u0219ti negativist \u0219i antipatizezi pozitivismul exagerat \u0219i invers. \u0218i bine\u00een\u021beles, fiecare \u00ee\u0219i absolutizeaz\u0103 antipatia, o crede ceva obiectiv \u2013 mama \u00eemi zice de fapt \u201ece antipatic\u0103 e actri\u021ba asta\u201d \u0219i m\u0103 \u0219i ia ca martor, \u201enu \u021bi se pare?\u201d \u0219i e enervat\u0103 dac\u0103 nu vreau s\u0103 recunosc Adev\u0103rul. Exist\u0103 bine\u00een\u021beles \u0219i antipatie indus\u0103 programatic prin ideologie \u0219i de multe ori nici n-are o realitate visceral\u0103, e doar o conven\u021bie. \u0218i mai e antipatia venit\u0103 din necunoa\u0219tere, din neobi\u0219nuin\u021b\u0103 \u2013 mie mi-s antipatici autori \u00eenainte s\u0103-i fi citit, doar pe baza unei impresii \u0219i pe urm\u0103 am o surpriz\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dac\u0103 m\u0103 uit la o list\u0103 cu cele mai bune romane rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti, cum tocmai am f\u0103cut acum, ca s\u0103-mi amintesc antipatiile, descop\u0103r c\u0103 majoritatea m\u0103 irit\u0103 prin lipsa de umor, \u00een primul r\u00eend, prin senza\u021bia de oprimare pe care mi-o dau, ca \u0219i cum m-ar \u021bine \u00eentr-o clas\u0103 de \u0219coal\u0103 \u00een continuare. Dar e o senza\u021bie venit\u0103 tocmai din cauza \u0219colii \u0219i n-are mult de-a face cu c\u0103r\u021bile \u00een sine. Dac\u0103 m\u0103 apuc s\u0103 le recitesc, intru \u00een filmul lor \u0219i \u00eel iau ca atare (nimic nu mi-e mai antipatic dec\u00eet atitudinea de consumator a cititorilor care spun \u201ea\u0219 fi vrut altceva de la carte\u201d; nu, vreau ce-mi d\u0103, vreau s\u0103 fie autoarea sau autorul c\u00eermaci dibaci \u0219i s\u0103 m\u0103 duc\u0103 unde \u0219tie, nu unde vreau eu). <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dar cum construie\u0219ti un personaj inten\u021bionat antipatic? Unul simpatic parc\u0103 e mai u\u0219or, po\u021bi s\u0103-l pui la \u00eenceput \u00eentr-o situa\u021bie de victim\u0103 sau prin alte trucuri asem\u0103n\u0103toare \u2013 oare, simetric, \u00eel faci antipatic cu acelea\u0219i trucuri dar inversate? \u00cel pui de la \u00eenceput \u00eentr-o pozi\u021bie de putere, \u00eel faci un fel de tiran sau \u00eel faci prea satisf\u0103cut de sine? Nu \u0219tiu ce s\u0103 zic, mie mi-s simpatice personajele imorale sau egocentrate \u2013 dac\u0103 egocentrarea lor e mai degrab\u0103 inofensiv\u0103. Problema e deci cum \u00eel faci antipatic f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103-l faci simpatic tocmai din cauza sau datorit\u0103, \u00een cazul \u0103sta, a ceea ce ar trebui s\u0103-l fac\u0103 antipatic. Nici dac\u0103 e foarte zg\u00eercit \u0219i, s\u0103 zicem, \u00ee\u0219i priveaz\u0103 familia, copiii, de pl\u0103ceri din avari\u021bie \u2013 mi se face mil\u0103 de el, \u00een\u021beleg c\u0103 e nevrotic. Poate dac\u0103 \u0219i-ar face el totu\u0219i pl\u0103cerile \u0219i \u00eenc\u0103 \u00eentr-un fel c\u00eet mai nesim\u021bit. Asta ar fi deci o idee \u2013 s\u0103 fie nedrept. Nedreptatea se resimte visceral, studiile pe animale o demonstreaz\u0103 c\u0103 e un sentiment universal indignarea la nedreptate, furia st\u00eernit\u0103 de a\u0219a ceva. Am v\u0103zut multe momente nedrepte dar m\u0103 b\u00eentuie privirea unui \u021b\u0103ran \u00eentr-o pia\u021b\u0103, c\u00eend fusese nedrept\u0103\u021bit de cineva, nu \u0219tiu de ce, i-am v\u0103zut doar privirea, o combina\u021bie de neputin\u021b\u0103 \u0219i indignare sf\u00eent\u0103, i-a\u0219 zice, fiindc\u0103 are r\u0103d\u0103cinile undeva foarte ad\u00eenc, fundamental. Nu \u0219tiu ce i se f\u0103cuse, era ceva legat de o femeie, era \u0219i ea pe acolo, parc\u0103, dar mai \u00eencolo, fuseser\u0103 separa\u021bi cumva? Dar \u00een ce fel fusese umilit, asta \u0219tiu sigur. \u0218i am sim\u021bit o antipatie total\u0103, uciga\u0219\u0103, pentru cel care-l umilise, de\u0219i nici nu \u0219tiu cine era, nici nu \u0219tiu ce se \u00eent\u00eemplase. Dac\u0103 a\u0219 scrie \u00eentr-o povestire asta, nu \u0219tiu cum a\u0219 putea s-o fac f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 trebuiasc\u0103 s\u0103 povestesc \u0219i ce s-a \u00eent\u00eemplat \u0219i s\u0103 \u0219i r\u0103m\u00een\u0103 antipatia. Nici m\u0103car nu pot s\u0103 descriu privirea, ar trebui s\u0103 m\u0103 bazez pe capacitatea de evocare a cititorului. Era un \u021b\u0103ran t\u00een\u0103r, st\u0103tea pe trotuar \u00een fa\u021ba \u0219aormeriei de l\u00eeng\u0103 pia\u021b\u0103 \u0219i se uita \u00een direc\u021bia aia ca un c\u00eeine izgonit. Am v\u0103zut-o parc\u0103 \u0219i pe femeie, nu \u0219tiu de ce a\u0219a am impresia. La \u0219aormeria aia stau tot felul de broscoi agresivi, samsari unii, taximetri\u0219ti, dar \u0219i frecangii, poate unul din ei \u00eel agresase cumva. Asociez locul \u0103la cu un alt moment, c\u00eend un inspector de la prim\u0103rie, cred, sau de la firma de salubritate, habar n-am, certa ni\u0219te m\u0103tur\u0103tori c\u0103 le-a sc\u0103pat ceva nem\u0103turat. Era t\u00een\u0103r, ar\u0103tos, aranjat, u\u0219or milit\u0103ros, ca un inspector, \u0219i ceva dispre\u021buitor \u00een tonul lui \u00eemi spunea c\u0103 la prim\u0103rie sau la firm\u0103 la el le vorbe\u0219te total invers superiorilor \u0219i asta mi l-a f\u0103cut automat antipatic. La Camil Petrescu se vede bine asta, cum prezint\u0103 el anumite personaje \u0219i cum le prezint\u0103 pe altele, dup\u0103 clasa lor social\u0103 \u2013 \u0219i asta mi l-a f\u0103cut dintotdeauna antipatic ca autor. Aceea\u0219i pia\u021b\u0103 \u0219i mintea mea a combinat momentele \u2013 de\u0219i erau diferite, mintea mea le-a pus \u00een acela\u0219i pachet, aceea\u0219i senza\u021bie de nedreptate. Orice nu f\u0103cuser\u0103 m\u0103tur\u0103torii \u0103ia, nu meritau tonul \u0103la, nu doar dur, dar \u0219i plin de importan\u021b\u0103, ca \u0219i cum Bucure\u0219tiul n-ar fi o gunoi\u0219te imens\u0103, \u00een toate sensurile, nu doar cel literal \u0219i ca \u0219i cum interven\u021bia lui era crucial\u0103. Cam pe aici, la nedreptate, ar fi butonul unei antipatii universale, nu doar al uneia personale. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Asta ar fi deci o idee \u2013 s\u0103 fie nedrept. Nedreptatea se resimte visceral.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":130,"featured_media":3580,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[349,784],"tags":[787,715,762,785],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-3581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anchete","category-personajul-antipatic-din-literatura","tag-anchete","tag-dan-sociu","tag-nr-9-2021","tag-personajul-antipatic-din-literatura"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Dan-Sociu.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/130"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3581"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3581\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3583,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3581\/revisions\/3583"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3581"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistafamilia.ro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcoauthors&post=3581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}